TL;DR
Get sports gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A false-start penalty against Chiefs right tackle Jaylon Moore erased Patrick Mahomes’ apparent go-ahead touchdown in Kansas City’s 28-24 loss to Denver in Week 8. The call drew criticism from Chiefs fans, but Travis Kelce said Moore flinched, and Tom Brady said the ruling was correct, according to reports. The source does not establish that fans were cheating or that officials targeted Kansas City.
A false-start penalty against Kansas City Chiefs right tackle Jaylon Moore erased Patrick Mahomes’ apparent go-ahead touchdown in the team’s 28-24 Week 8 loss to the Denver Broncos, prompting angry reactions from Chiefs fans and a debate over whether the call was correct. The available reporting says fans objected to the ruling, while tight end Travis Kelce and former quarterback Tom Brady defended it; it does not substantiate the headline’s suggestion that anyone had been “cheating.”
The disputed play came late in the game, after Kansas City had surrendered an 11-point fourth-quarter lead. On a fourth-down attempt near the goal line, Mahomes appeared to connect for a touchdown with Rashee Rice. Officials flagged Moore for a false start, nullifying the score. The Chiefs had another play but did not convert, and Denver secured the four-point victory.
The call became the focus of reactions after the game. Coach Andy Reid disputed the ruling, according to the supplied report, while Mahomes questioned it more gently. Brittany Mahomes also criticized the flag publicly later that night. The source material does not provide the full wording of their comments or an official explanation from the NFL or the game officials.
Travis Kelce took a different view. A report quoted him saying of Moore, “Yeah, he flinches,” and said Kelce agreed with his brother Jason that the penalty was warranted. Tom Brady also said the call was correct, according to a linked Yahoo! Sports summary. These are attributed opinions about the play; they do not substitute for a formal officiating review.
The Flag Changed Kansas City’s Last Chance
The penalty mattered because it removed what appeared to be a potential winning touchdown from a game decided by four points. Instead of taking the lead late, the Chiefs faced another down after the score was wiped out and could not convert. That sequence made the officiating decision central to the immediate reaction, even as Kansas City’s fourth-quarter collapse also contributed to the defeat.
The disagreement is also relevant to how fans assess close calls involving high-profile teams and players. Some Chiefs supporters viewed the flag as decisive and unfair; Kelce and Brady publicly backed the ruling. Without an official review or additional evidence, the available material supports describing this as a contested call, not proof of bias, misconduct or cheating.
The loss was reported as Kansas City’s second consecutive defeat after a 5-0 start, and it came against an AFC West rival. The result therefore carried implications beyond one late play, although the source does not establish the standings consequences or provide a full updated division table.
Products Worth Considering

Coleman Cascade 3-in-1 Portable Camp Stove with Grill and Griddle

Garmin Forerunner 570 GPS Running Smartwatch, 42mm, Aluminum, Whitestone/Cloud Blue

Garmin Instinct® 3 Tactical Solar 45mm Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Broncos Game Reached the Disputed Play
Kansas City led 24-13 entering the fourth quarter, according to the supplied background, but Denver rallied to win 28-24. The Chiefs’ late chance to regain the lead came after that comeback, making the penalty an especially prominent moment in postgame discussion. The game took place in Denver at Empower Field at Mile High, according to the linked summaries.
The reporting describes differing reactions within the Chiefs orbit: Reid challenged the call, Mahomes expressed doubt, and Kelce said Moore moved before the snap. Brady’s assessment was also reported as support for the officials. Those reactions show that disagreement about the play was not limited to fans, but they do not reveal what the officials saw or whether the league reviewed the decision.
The supplied source is a November 6 Yahoo! Sports report and excerpts from related coverage. Its headline uses the phrase “Been cheating”, but the material provided does not identify a substantiated cheating allegation or evidence of deliberate rule-breaking by fans, players or officials. The article’s established event is the penalty and the reaction it generated.
““Yeah, he flinches.””
— Travis Kelce, as quoted in a report about the play
The League’s Review Is Not Provided
The source material does not include an NFL officiating explanation, a formal postgame review, or video analysis establishing precisely what the officials observed before the snap. It also does not say whether the league assessed the call afterward or whether any clarification was issued.
The headline’s reference to “cheating” is not supported by the factual details supplied. No evidence is presented that officials deliberately targeted the Chiefs, that fans engaged in cheating, or that the penalty was intentionally misapplied. The claim that the call was correct is attributed to Kelce and Brady, while Reid’s disagreement and fan criticism are reactions rather than proof either way.
The excerpts also leave some details unresolved, including the exact sequence of the final downs and the full wording of comments by Reid, Mahomes and Brittany Mahomes. Those gaps limit how firmly the episode can be characterized beyond a disputed false-start call that erased an apparent touchdown.
Any Official Explanation Could Clarify
The next relevant development would be an official explanation or review from the NFL, if one is issued. The supplied reporting does not state that a review is scheduled or that officials have announced further details, so no outcome should be assumed.
Kansas City will also have to move on from the loss and prepare for its next game. The source identifies the defeat as the team’s second in a row but does not provide the next opponent, kickoff date or a current standings update. For now, the play remains a point of disagreement, while the confirmed result is a 28-24 Denver win.
Key Questions
What happened on the disputed play?
Officials called a false start on Chiefs right tackle Jaylon Moore, wiping out an apparent Patrick Mahomes touchdown pass to Rashee Rice late in Kansas City’s 28-24 loss to Denver.
Did the penalty decide the game?
It erased a potential go-ahead score and Kansas City did not convert the following play. The Chiefs had also surrendered an 11-point fourth-quarter lead, so the loss involved more than the penalty alone.
Did Travis Kelce say the call was correct?
Yes. The supplied coverage quotes Kelce saying, “Yeah, he flinches,” about Moore and reports that Kelce supported the false-start call.
Is there evidence that officials cheated or targeted the Chiefs?
No such evidence appears in the supplied material. It reports criticism and disagreement about the ruling, but does not establish deliberate bias or cheating.
Has the NFL issued an official explanation?
The provided source material does not include an official explanation or a postgame review of the call. Whether the league has issued further clarification remains unclear from the reporting supplied.
Source: sports.yahoo.com
